How Does Acrylic Compare with Polycarbonate?
Clear plastics often get grouped together in procurement discussions, but acrylic and polycarbonate behave very differently once you start cutting, bending, printing, shipping, and putting parts into real-world service. From a manufacturer’s perspective, the best choice is the one that protects your appearance targets, durability requirements, compliance needs, and fabrication yield at the same time.
Acrylic is technically PMMA and is widely selected for clarity, surface finish, UV stability, and clean visual presentation. Polycarbonate is selected when impact abuse, higher heat tolerance, and safety under sudden load are the primary concerns. The practical decision is rarely about a single property, so the sections below compare the two materials in the way they typically perform during production and end use.
Table of Contents
- Quick Property Comparison
- Clarity, Gloss, and Visual Presentation
- Impact Resistance and Safety Under Abuse
- Heat, Dimensional Stability, and Long-Term Load
- UV Weathering and Outdoor Appearance
- Fabrication and Surface Decoration
- Cost and Risk Control
- How to Choose for Common Product Types
- Specification Tips That Prevent Production Surprises
- Conclusion
Quick Property Comparison
The values below are typical ranges commonly published in industrial comparison charts and resin data sheets. For impact and heat properties, standards such as ASTM D256 and ASTM D648 are often used to report results. A well-known material comparison table from Curbell Plastics reports notched Izod impact and heat deflection temperature using those standards. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
| Property | Acrylic PMMA | Polycarbonate PC | What it means in practice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Light transmission | About 92 percent | About 88 percent | Acrylic looks more glass-like in many display uses. |
| Notched Izod impact at room temperature | About 0.4 ft-lb per inch | About 12 to 16 ft-lb per inch | PC is dramatically tougher against drops and strikes. |
| Heat deflection temperature | Around 195°F at higher stress | Around 270 to 280°F | PC handles higher heat before deforming under load. |
| Glass transition temperature | Around 105°C for common grades | Around 147°C | PC keeps stiffness deeper into elevated temperatures. |
| Density | About 1.17 to 1.20 g per cm3 | About 1.20 to 1.22 g per cm3 | Weight difference is usually minor in most parts. |
Clarity, Gloss, and Visual Presentation
If a part’s job is to sell a product visually, acrylic is often the easier path to a premium look. Multiple industrial references commonly cite acrylic light transmission around 92 percent compared with about 88 percent for polycarbonate. :contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6} This gap seems small on paper, but in retail lighting, countertop environments, and back panels, it can influence perceived brightness and color fidelity.
Acrylic also polishes well after cutting, which helps when the edge itself is visible. For applications such as branded packaging, countertop organizers, or high-gloss transparent panels, acrylic’s finish quality can reduce the need for secondary appearance fixes.
Practical examples where acrylic often wins:
Clear product enclosures such as an Acrylic Box where edge quality and transparency drive perceived value.
Merchandising structures such as an Acrylic Display Stand where clean faces and crisp printed graphics matter.
Impact Resistance and Safety Under Abuse
Polycarbonate is selected when the part must survive knocks, drops, or repeated handling. In Curbell Plastics’ published comparison table, notched Izod impact for polycarbonate is shown in the 12 to 16 ft-lb per inch range, while acrylic is around 0.4 ft-lb per inch. :contentReference[oaicite:7]{index=7} This is why polycarbonate is widely used for machine guards, protective glazing, and high-traffic environments.
What this means for manufacturing decisions:
If a shipped product is likely to be hit during installation, bounced in logistics, or handled roughly at the point of use, PC can reduce breakage risk.
If the product must fail in a more forgiving way, polycarbonate’s toughness can be an advantage.
Acrylic can still be sufficiently strong for many stationary products, but it is not the best choice for repeated impact loading.
Heat, Dimensional Stability, and Long-Term Load
For parts that sit near heat sources or carry load, polycarbonate typically holds shape better. The ASTM D648 heat deflection values shown by Curbell Plastics list polycarbonate around 270 to 280°F, while acrylic is lower around 195°F at a higher stress condition. :contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8} The glass transition temperatures commonly referenced are also higher for PC, around 147°C, versus around 105°C for PMMA. :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}
In production terms, this affects:
Shelf components that span unsupported distances.
Wall-mounted panels near lighting or warm airflow.
Parts that must stay flat after printing, assembly, and packaging storage.
UV Weathering and Outdoor Appearance
Acrylic has a strong reputation for outdoor clarity retention, especially for applications where yellowing or haze would ruin appearance. Polycarbonate can be made UV-resistant, but outdoor performance depends heavily on resin grade and surface treatment. For signage and brand-facing parts, this is why acrylic remains common for long-term visual stability.
A practical product category where acrylic is often chosen:
Branding and wayfinding panels such as Acrylic Signage where long-term clarity and color presentation are critical.
Fabrication and Surface Decoration
Both materials can be cut and formed, but they respond differently to heat and finishing steps.
Acrylic is widely favored for:
Laser cutting with clean edges and controllable transparency.
Polishing and edge finishing for visible surfaces.
UV printing and surface decoration when you want crisp graphics on a glass-like substrate.
Polycarbonate is often favored for:
Complex parts requiring toughness, especially if assembly or use involves flexing.
Situations where accidental impacts during installation are common.
From the perspective of a factory that runs full acrylic processing, controlling the process chain matters as much as resin choice. YUCHENGDINGSHANG highlights an end-to-end acrylic workflow including sheet selection, cutting, thermoforming, polishing, UV printing, and assembly with quality control. :contentReference[oaicite:10]{index=10} When the same team controls cutting accuracy, bending consistency, and print adhesion, it reduces appearance variation between batches and improves repeatability for scaled production.
Cost and Risk Control
In many standard clear applications, acrylic is often more cost-efficient than polycarbonate at the material level, while also delivering higher clarity. Polycarbonate tends to be positioned as the higher-toughness engineering choice, which can carry a higher raw-material cost and may require extra protection against scratching in some environments.
A manufacturer-focused way to decide is to compare total project cost rather than sheet price:
Material cost plus scrap rate during processing
Secondary finishing steps and protective packaging requirements
Damage rate during shipping and installation
Service life and replacement expectations
How to Choose for Common Product Types
Display, merchandising, and premium presentation
Acrylic is usually the first option when the product’s primary requirement is visual clarity, high-gloss surfaces, and sharp edges. This is typical for point-of-sale fixtures and product risers, including Acrylic Display Stand programs where consistent appearance across multiple store locations is essential.
Enclosures, organizers, and packaging-style parts
Acrylic often performs well when the part is relatively protected from impact and the goal is clean transparency. An Acrylic Box is a good example where edge polish, squareness, and stable appearance are usually more important than extreme toughness.
Brand signage and long-term visual stability
For long-term brand presentation, acrylic is commonly chosen due to clarity and weathering reputation. Acrylic Signage projects benefit when the material keeps a clean look under lighting and over time.
Home products and decorative components
For décor-driven SKUs, acrylic offers a strong balance of appearance, finish, and fabrication flexibility. This is especially useful in Acrylic Home Decoration where surface quality and design detail directly affect perceived value.
Specification Tips That Prevent Production Surprises
Before freezing material selection, it helps to define a few items that directly impact manufacturability and final quality:
Required clarity standard: acceptable haze level, edge appearance expectation, and whether polishing is required.
Impact scenario: define whether drops, knocks, or repeated handling are realistic in the end-use environment.
Heat exposure: include both ambient temperature and whether the part sits near lighting, motors, warm air, or hot liquids.
Surface decoration: printing type, ink durability target, and cleaning chemicals expected in service.
Dimensional tolerances: flatness expectations after forming, printing, and assembly.
With clear requirements, the factory can propose the best resin grade and process route, then confirm performance through sampling and inspection checkpoints across cutting, bending, polishing, and printing.
Conclusion
Acrylic and polycarbonate are both transparent plastics, but they serve different priorities. Acrylic is usually the better choice for maximum clarity, premium finish, and visual stability in display, signage, and decorative applications. Polycarbonate is the better choice when impact toughness and higher-temperature performance dominate the requirement list.
To move from comparison to a final decision, share your target dimensions, load and impact conditions, surface-finish expectations, and any printing or branding needs. A manufacturer can then recommend the most suitable sheet grade, confirm feasibility through prototypes, and lock down a stable process plan for consistent production.